Summary of studies that
generally depict positive relationships between physical activity and academic
performance (listed in order by author)
Study (type)/ Reference |
Sample Participants |
Physical
Activity (PhysA) Measure |
Academic
Performance (AP) Measure |
Key
Results |
California (CA) Statewide Study of Physically Fit Kids
(CS)/ California Department of Education (2002) (a) |
954,000
CA students: 353,000 5th graders, 322,000 7th graders, 279,000
9th graders |
State mandated
Fitnessgram includes 6
fitness areas- cardiovascular endurance, body comp (% body fat), abd
strength/end, trunk strength/flex, upper bdy strength/end, and overall flex |
Part
of CA Standardized Testing and Reporting Program: including the Stanford Achievement Test 9th Edition
(SAT-9); (both reading and math scores) |
-Sig
C~ between higher reading/math scores and higher levels of fitness -greater
C~ in math than in reading -F
show higher AP than M particularly at higher Fitness Levels |
Relation
of Academic Performance to Physical Activity and Fitness in Children (CS)/Dwyer et al. (2001) |
Nationally
representative sample of 7,961 Australian schoolchildren, 7-15 yo |
Q interview of
students; height & body mass; various indoor and outdoor tests measuring:
muscular force, pwr, & endurance; cardioresp endurance; flexibility; BMI;
lung function; PWC @ HR 170 |
Scholastic
ability rated on 5-point scale by school representative, usually principle |
-Sig
C~ bet questionnaire, 1.6-km run, setups, pushups, 50-m sprint, & long
jump and AP -No
sig C~ w/ PWC @ HR 170 and AP |
School
Health, Academic Performance and Exercise (SHAPE) study; An investigation of
the effects of daily physical activity on the health of primary school
children
(LT)/ Dwyer
et al. (1983) (b) |
Phase
I (1978): 519 Primary South Australian
schoolchildren, 10 yo Phase
II (1980): 216 Primary South Australian
schoolchildren, 10 yo, w/ 2 years experience in PhysA program |
Phase I:
observations of endurance fitness, 4 skin folds, blood pressure, and blood
lipids b/f and after 14-wk randomized PhysA Trial Phase II: same observations as Phase I. (However, on
10 yo children who have participated in 2 years of the PhysA program) |
Phase
I and II: arithmetic and reading tests |
Phase
I: -PhysA
group had sig gains in PWC and sig decreases in skin folds -No
sig differences in plasma cholesterol, triglycerides and HDL -Despite
45-60min/day decrease in academic instruction, no sig differences in AP;
there was a trend for higher math scores and larger gain in behavior scores
of the PhysA group Phase
II: -sig
decrease in skin folds, greater PWC, lower blood pressure (w/ statistical sig
in M diastolic pressure) -AP
noted to remain the same |
Sport
Participation and Perceived Academic Performance of School Children and Youth (CS)/ Linder
(1999) |
4,690
students in Hong Kong, 9-18 yo |
Q
of PhysA participation, completed by student |
Q
of academic performance, completed by student |
-C~
bet PhysA and AP were significant but low -those
who perceive themselves to be the better achievers in AP are as a group the
more frequent PhysA participants, with stronger motives for PhysA involvement
(particularly for F) |
The
Physical Activity Participation-Academic Performance Relationship Revisited:
Perceived and Actual Performance and the Effect of Banding (CS)/ Linder
(2002) (c) |
1,447
students in various bands of Hong Kong schools, 13-17 yo (736 M, 711F) |
Q
of PhysA participation completed by student |
Academic
School Records |
-Perceived AP and potential tended to be
higher for students with more PhysA (particularly for M) -Higher banded schools had significant C~ w/
more PhysA time. -No C~ found bet actual AP and PhysA |
The
Relationship Between Physical Activity, Self-Esteem, and Academic Achievement
in 12-Year-Old Children (CS)/Tremblay et al. (2000) |
6,923
6th grade Canadian students |
Elementary
School Climate Study Q including academic and social climate of classrooms and school,
family background, PhysA participation, self-esteem |
Reading,
math, science, and writing standardized test scores |
-PhysA had negative C~ w/ BMI -PhysA had positive C~ w/ self-esteem -relationship between PhysA and AP is weak -PhysA may be indirectly related to AP by
improving phys health and self-esteem |
The
Trois Rivieres experience by Unknown
Author (LT)/ Cited
by Trudeau et al. (1998), Shephard (1997), and Shephard and Lavallee (1993) |
546
urban and rural Canadian students, 6-12 yo, split into control and
PhysA/experimental groups by class |
Aerobic
test including VO2 peak and PWC 170 measured each year w/in 2-wks of each
child’s birthday |
Classroom
average of French, English, math, science, and overall conduct (mean of the
five annual assessments) |
-PhysA groups showed sig advantage of VO2
peak (8-11yo; M less than F; urban less than rural) -M in PhysA groups showed training response
to PWC 170 -During 1st grade-control grp had
higher AP. Following 5 grades- PhysA had higher AP. Sig in grades 2, 3, 5,
and 6. (F > M) |
Vanves, France study conducted in 1950 by Unknown
Author (LT)/ Cited
by Shephard (1997) (d) |
Entire
primary school (PhysA /experimental
grp), Other
primary schools in Paris area (control grp) |
Not
Available |
Certificate
of Study Test |
-Despite 26% decrease in academic
instruction, AP performance of both grps were comparable -PhysA tended to be more calm and attentive,
w/ less disciplinary problems and less sick/absence days |
a
Study completed by California
Department of Education (CDE) (2002).
Information gathered through website and personal email with
representative, not through professional journal. The CDE is working with academicians so results can be written
and published in a peer-reviewed journal. b
Actual Phase I study was
unavailable. Therefore, all
information for Phases I and II was attained from this single source. c
Hong Kong schools are banded into
several groups consisting of high-band and low band ratings (band-1 and
band-5 respectively). Higher banded
schools tend to have better academic students who participate more in PhysA
than lower banded schools. d
Actual Vanves, France study could not
be found in English. Therefore, all
information is from journal article by Shephard (1997) who cites the French
studies. |
||||
PhysA
Measure = Test(s) used for
Physical Activity measurement; AP Measure = Test(s) used for Academic Performance measurements; (CS)
= Cross-sectional Study; (LT)
= Longitudinal Study; yo = years old; C~ = Correlation; F = Female; M
= Male; Q
= questionnaire; PWC
= Physical Work Capacity; HR
= Heart Rate; BMI
= Body-mass index; Sig
= Significant |
||||
Table
Developed by Leslee Scheuer, Tech Impact Grant Coordinator, University of
Central Florida, 2003-2004 |