AN INJURY PREVENTION INITIATIVE BASED UPON RESULTS FROM THE FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT SCREEN (FMS)
written by Bill
Utsey, Director of Athletics, Greenville County Schools,
Greenville, South Carolina
This
past school year saw our accident insurance premiums for our
athletes go up 100% over the previous year. This was a traumatic
adjustment for us, and more so for our parents as the premium
is a fee that is paid by the athlete in our school district.
We caught a lot of flak from our parents on this cost change.
As the district's director of athletics, I was trying my best
to come up with a solution of any kind.
One of my answers came when our athletic trainers, provided
to us by the Greenville
Hospital System, mentioned a test called the functional
movement screen (FMS). I immediately began asking questions,
and diligently researched to find out what this test was all
about. Although a relatively new concept, my reading quickly
told me that scoring below average on this test is a high
indicator for injury susceptibility. The research showed that
those who scored below a 14 on the seven-item FMS had a high
propensity for injury.
A research
article (Kiesel, et al) linked high risk of injury to
National
Football League players with low FMS scores. Seeing how
the NFL uses the FMS in its annual NFL
combine went a long way in convincing me the value of
FMS screening. When I read further that this test, because
of its ability to locate those individuals with high risk
of injury, was being used by the United
States Marine Corps, I was sold on it as a potential tool
for an injury prevention initiative in our school district.
It was revealed to me through my research into the Functional
Movement Screen that each of the assessment items were indicators
for weaknesses in the specific areas of functional movement,
core strength, stability, and balance. In another study the
FMS was administered to firefighters
in Tucson, Arizona, and, after a core strengthening program
was implemented, there was a 42% decrease in injuries along
with a 62% decrease in lost time due to injuries. All of these
uses and findings were highly encouraging and convinced me
that we needed to change directions in our strength and conditioning
programs and in our warm-up routines.
We are fortunate in our school district to have a wonderful
partnership with our hospital system. Under the auspices of
the Greenville Hospital System, we have full-time certified
athletic trainers in our schools administered by the Steadman
Hawkins Clinic of the Carolinas (a nationally renown orthopedic
practice). The Steadman Hawkins team includes their physical
therapy partner, Proaxis
Therapy and their high performance sports fitness partner,
Acceleration
Sports Institute (ASI). We contacted both of these health
and fitness practices - Mike
Osler and Ryan
Geary with Proaxis and Darren
Holmes with ASI - to inquire as to how we can put together
a comprehensive injury prevention initiative using the FMS
as our baseline of thinking.
Our initial thought was to administer the FMS to all 8,000+
athletes in our school district. Although the test only takes
about five minutes to administer, we could not possibly make
this happen given our personnel limitations. Mike and Ryan,
using their professional expertise and through their connections,
came up with a series of prescriptive exercises designed specifically
for each area of weakness that the seven-item FMS highlights.
This "Universal
Prevention Program" consisted of eleven exercises
to be incorporated into the team or athlete's warm-up routine.
Mike and Ryan, based upon their discussions with Dr.
Darin Padua of the Department
of Exercise and Sports Health at the University of North
Carolina and their findings on the common deficits in the
overall high school athlete population, selected the exercises
for our program. The idea, of course, is that these exercises
would work to rehab those areas that were indeed deficient
and maintain high proficiency for those that were already
proficient. In other words, we were going to assume that everyone
was deficient on the FMS and then institute a program that
would consist of corrective exercises proven to improve one's
performance score in the FMS.
The injury prevention exercise regimen consisting of five
dynamic warm-up exercises, four functional intervention exercises,
one exercise that worked on balance and stability, and one
that worked on agility and bodily control. Combined, the "Universal
Prevention Program" exercises could be completed
in seven to ten minutes.
We met with all of our coaches, provided them with a laminated
sheet of the prevention exercises, and showed them a video
that gave an introduction and basis for the program along
with a demonstration of each of the eleven exercises. The
videos
can be accessed at the Steadman Hawkins Clinic of the Carolinas
website.
Additionally, Proaxis personnel along with our certified
athletic trainers will be testing a number of our athletes
on the deep squat item of the FMS. This item is the strongest
indicator of functional deficiency. The deep squat is performed
with the hands holding a stick or PVC pipe above the head
and squatting all the way down. Keeping the stick directly
above the head and keeping the heels on the ground are critical
indices. Additionally, the feet should be under the shoulders
and the thighs should go well below parallel.
Athletes showing significant deficiencies in the deep squat
will be placed on an additional set of rehabilitative exercises.
Again, the goal of the program is to reduce the incidences
of injuries in our athletes. The objective is to have the
athletes be proficient enough in the end to hypothetically
score above 14 on the FMS. Such a proficiency or score on
the FMS would place the athletes in the category current research
shows will have fewer incidences of injuries.
Additionally, we will be looking at selecting supplemental
exercises to incorporate into our off- and pre-season strength
and conditioning programs. These exercises, of course, will
be focused on corrective approaches to functional movement,
balance, stability and core strength. Our Proaxis partner
will be working with ASI
to develop these exercises.
Of course, there are skeptics on the FMS and the findings
associated with its concept. Mike is quick to point out the
fact that there is no program that will prevent all injuries.
However, if studies of FMS results and corrective programs
continue to show positive correlations regarding injury prevention
and athletic performance, we will be on the high road and
cutting edge. In deciding whether or not to take this new,
innovative approach to warm-up routines and supplemental exercises
for athletes, we simply asked ourselves, "Is this good
for kids, and will it at value to our program?"
With the answer affirmative to both questions, the decision
was easy for us. In the end, we are aiming for a significant
change in the incidence of injury to our athletes and, when
they do get injured, a much faster recovery time. We are excited
about this new approach, and are glad that we have dependable
partners such as Proaxis Therapy and Acceleration Sports Institute
at our side as we move forward.