LESSON PLANNING AND THE WORLD WIDE WEB
Written by: Martha Beagle
(bio)

The World Wide Web has a plethora of lesson plan sites. The challenge that comes with the “wealth” of sites is being able to identify those sites that provide high quality and reliable lesson plans. It is relatively easy to perform a search and find lesson plans covering a wide range of topics and for all grade levels, including college and university. I recently did a simple Google search for lesson plans and 13,800,000 lesson plan websites popped up. It would be a fair assumption to believe that some of these lesson plans do not meet standards for effective planning and teaching. So how does one go about sorting through these sites, and finding lesson plans that are credible and worthy of our time?

The Internet can provide some great teaching ideas. It is definitely easy to use the Internet to provide lesson plans because of the ease in searching, and the small amount of time it takes to complete a search. Because it takes time and effort to create numerous lesson plans, the readymade lesson plans that can be found on the Web are appealing. As educators we should be cautious in the lesson plans we find; we should develop a practice of evaluating lesson plan websites with a resolute eye and only select those that meet criterion of merit.

It cannot be accepted that all websites, lesson plan websites specifically, are evaluated for excellence and soundness just because they are posted on the World Wide Web. Websites do not have to meet the standards of book or journal publishing, nor is there a set of standards that all websites must meet before anything is posted. In fact, there is nowhere to go to find a rating or critique of a website – no guarantees except “user beware.”

Kathy Schrock (2002) developed the Five W’s for web site evaluation which may help in sorting and simplifying the task of identifying credible websites. Here are the W’s further explained to provide direction in evaluating general websites that can be applied to lesson plan websites:

  1. Who wrote the pages, and are they an expert in the field?
    • Try to determine who the website's authority is. Try to determine the author's credibility. If an author is not expressly written, you should be able to find the sponsor and then evaluate the sponsor. Try to determine if there is a place on the website to contact the author or sponsor.
  2. What is the purpose of the site?
    • This is linked to the objectivity - is this a site that is truly a lesson plan site, or is it an advertising site disguising itself as information?
  3. Where does the information come from?
    • This is linked to the accuracy of the information provided on the website. It is important to be wary of websites that do not link to other websites that support or substantiate what they have posted. Credible websites are without spelling and grammatical errors.
  4. When was the site created or updated?
    • This is linked to the currency of the website. A credible website should have the date posted when it was created as well as the date that it was last updated.
  5. Why is the information valuable?
    • This is linked to evaluating what exposure this information has across the wider Internet. It is important to look for information that is confirmed by other sources. Are there other sources that confirm the lesson plans on this website?

Frequently used domain names are .com, .edu, .gov, .net, and .org. A domain preceded by a tilde (~) means an individual created the make-up of the site. If that is the case, the web author’s credentials should be provided to help determine the integrity of the website and its contents. Lesson plan sites that are offered by specialized professional organizations, university libraries and departments of education, school systems, and foundations generally are credible sources, but there still is no assurance of excellence and consistency.

When breaking down the individual lesson plan, the plan should be detailed with many distinctive types of activities that engage students of various aptitudes; should follow a highly ordered, rational progression; should read easily and be simple to comprehend; and should provide countless unique follow-up activities to carry on with the lesson. Creativity and innovation should be evident within the lesson plan that makes use of novel, practical experiences and an eagerness to take a chance to try something new.

Sites to further help in understanding website evaluation:

Credible lesson plan sites for physical education:

In conclusion, the Internet is definitely a bonus for all teachers, but it should be used with prudence. Undoubtedly, the magnitude of lesson plans will continue to increase. Being lesson plan savvy and working with the best websites makes finding the best lesson plans easy and helpful for teachers who are always busy.

 

References
Kathy Schrock’s Internet Curriculum (2002). http://kathyschrock.net/eval/index.htm
Clickers, Be Aware (2006). http://www.newhorizons.org/strategies/technology/edwards_mccardle.htm

 

(pelinks4u home)


 

 
 
 

home | site sponsorships | naspe forum | submit idea or experience | pe store | calendar | e-mail

Copyright © of PELINKS4U  | All Rights Reserved