Health-Related
Fitness Assessment for Students with Disabilities
This article will discuss the application and principles of health-related
fitness (HRF) assessment testing for students with disabilities.
While physical educators are used to assessment testing the general
population, very few have the knowledge and skill to test special
populations. As with any good programming, assessment is necessary
for proscription. However, physical educators should recognize there
is a greater need for individualization through assessment for students
with disabilities for program development and personal improvement.
The Surgeon General reports that students with disabilities are
in comparatively poorer physical health, and are at a greater risk
of health-related diseases than the general population. This article
will discuss 10 HRF issues: 1) assessment
guideline, 2) changing norm-based tests
to criteria-based tests, 3) cardiovascular
evaluation adjustments, 4) legislative
mandates toward assessment, 5) the
importance of HRF assessment before participation, 6)
what should instructors do prior to selecting a HRF assessments,
7) things for instructors to think
about during HRF testing, 8) reporting the results, 9)
norm-based fitness tests composite example, and 10)
additional assessments used in adapted physical activity.
This article will give readers a greater appreciation for individualization
of prescription through assessment, how laws impact assessment,
and the benefits of health-related fitness testing for students
with disabilities. There are supportive web sites for the topics
being discussed, course information about APENS certification, and
IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) update guidelines.
Phillip Conatser
Adapted Physical Education Editor
downloadable copy of the article
(Word) |
SUCCESSFUL
FITNESS TESTING |
General Guidelines
for Successful Health-Related Fitness Testing
Motivation can be a problem for many
students with disabilities because they do not understand fully
the concept of giving "100%" effort. To help with this
problem, the instructor can, for example, have students with disabilities
reach out to or jump to a buddy, jump out for a favorite toy, or
jump over a colored rope or disc during a broad jump test. Students
could also reach for a ball or toy during sit-ups and sit &
reach tests, or listen to their favorite music on a treadmill test
for motivation. Note: treadmills are an excellent means for testing
cardiovascular endurance because they provide a "steady pace"
for the students.
For attention deficits
issues, more verbal and physical cues may be needed, as well as
shorter periods of on-task time and/or more frequent changes of
task.
Over heating during vigorous
activity can especially be a problem for students who use wheelchairs,
or have spinal cord injuries. Keeping their bodies "cool"
is important, and maintaining body temperature can be achieved with
good air-conditioning, wet towels, and/or intermittent activity
breaks.
For students with spinal
cord injury, bladder and bowel evacuation should be implemented
prior to exercise testing.
For students that use
a wheelchair, straps may be applied to improve stability, and abdominal
binders and leg wraps will aid in venous return.
For some tests, gloves,
kneepads, and bracing should be used to avoid injuries.
To achieve more natural
breathing patterns, have the student use a full face mask during
the treadmill test.
More attempts should
be given to understand/learn the task. Learning tasks may take several
days of practice. Practice sessions should be scheduled prior to
the actual test.
Use a buddy for demonstration
of skills.
Use visual and physical
cues for starting/stopping signals.
Use a buddy to help with
encouragement and pacing on aerobic activities.
Use a buddy to keep count
and time.
Use a buddy to hold the
student's feet during sit-ups.
Extra spotters and safety
mats should be used.
Students with respiratory
conditions affected by allergens may need to be tested indoors.
To weigh a person that
cannot stand, have an assistant hold the student, weigh them together,
then subtract the weight of the assistant.
For students not able
to stand, lay them down on a mat to measure their height. |
New
course designed to prepare individuals for successful completion
of the APENS certification. This on-line experience is a great,
exciting, and easy way to advance your credentials. The course is
endorsed by APENS and NCPERID. Register now
online, or contact Dr. Scott Pedersen (505) 646-2071.
For more information on what is adapted
physical education, what the National Standards are, why and how
to take the exam, and how to become certified, including exam dates
and places for APENS, visit SUNY
Cortland, the online guide, or contact Dr. Tim Davis (607) 753-4969
|
Individual with Disabilities
Education Act
Office of Special Education
Programs (OSEP) officially launched a new Web site for information;
a "one stop shop" for IDEA 2004 can be found at: http://idea.ed.gov.
Final version of IDEA
Part B regulations in the Federal Register can be found here.
For more information
on IDEA 2004 visit: http://www.nichcy.org/idea.htm. |
|
|
Any ideas on activities to do with a 1st or 2nd grade APE
class that only has 1 child? I fear that I am not providing
enough "fun" for the student while still meeting his IEP
goals. ALso, my student does not like to come see me because
he has to be taken out of his class and it is just ME and
him. Any suggestions on how to get him to WANT to come to
APE? Please share in the forum. |
|
Changing
Tests Around
Instructors can create their own criteria-based
tests from norm-based tests. For example, instead of using the sit
& reach test, the instructor can use other methods to determine
if a student with cerebral palsy can or cannot touch their nose,
head, or subscapula for flexibility.
For students with autism or mental retardation,
instead of using the Pacer test, the instructor can assess students'
abilities (unassisted or assisted) on given skill requirements,
such as lining-up on the starting line, running to the opposite
sideline and back, or reacting to the pacing signal. Although comparable
flexibility scores or cardiovascular capabilities are not being
tested, skills to perform the test are being evaluated, thereby
giving some means for assessing improvement and program planning.
Instructors can also measure how many
successful attempts a student makes performing the skill, how long
it takes them to perform the skill, and/or the exact angle and distance
achieved. Instructors can virtually give numerical values to any
skill to facilitate assessment. Note: in most cases, self-comparison
on the level of improvement for a disabled student is more appropriate
than a comparison to "national norms."
|
CARDIOVASCULAR EVALUATION ADJUSTMENTS |
Individual Education
Act 2004 & Assessments
There should be a minimum of two types
of tests administered such as a) a
norm-based test (e.g., Physical Best and Individuals with Disabilities)
and b) a criteria-based test (e.g.,
I CAN or create your own).
An informal observation
of cooperation skills, interactive abilities, and emotional behaviors
should be performed during activity testing.
The person administering
the tests must be qualified.
The person interpreting
the results must be qualified.
The person writing the
IEP goals and objectives should be qualified.
In general, scoring
two standard deviations below the mean, two to three age levels
behind, and/or the inability to interact in a "normal"
environment will result in some form of help/intervention.
Note: each state determines
the definition for who "qualifies," however, many states
are very vague with the definition, therefore, physical educators
should take it upon themselves to adopt this role. Special education
teachers, counselors, and/or diagnosticians should not be the ones
assessing, determining placement or services, or writing IEP objectives
for physical activity. |
Things for the instructor
to think about during HRF testing
|
Fitness
tests should be in a natural environment (e.g., during play,
outside or inside, grass or turf, competitive or cooperative). |
|
Limit
distractions and noise, as well as excess or unused equipment
from the environment. |
|
Plan
ahead for the personnel and equipment necessary, and familiarize
yourself with the test. |
|
Explain test
questions clearly and understandably to students (physically
shaping, physical prompt, demonstration, verbal clues, pictures). |
|
Allow the
student opportunities to ask questions. |
|
Allow the
student ample practice time. |
|
Present skills
in a friendly, encouraging, playful fashion. |
|
Testing should
not exceed 45 minutes to an hour. |
|
Tests should
take place over several days in different environments (inside,
outside, game situation, individual skills). |
|
Different
types of assessments should be used. |
|
Instructors
should be sensitive to cultural diversity. |
|
|
|
|
For
appropriate placement and intervention, results need to be viewed
and evaluated considering the environment in which the test
was administered. |
|
Assessment
should include all of the consulting professionals' perspectives
using an ecological approach in a functional and natural setting. |
|
Include
in the assessment, students' overall functional abilities -
both their strengths and weaknesses. |
|
Results need
to be linked to IEP goals and objectives. |
|
Caregiver(s)
should be considered experts regarding students' abilities and
needs. |
|
Instructors
should have knowledge of the student's past and current physical,
cognitive, and social abilities. |
|
Remember to
look at the "big picture" when writing up the results.
|
|
Norm-Based
Fitness Tests Composite Example
Instructors can use these tests in conjunction
with a criteria-based assessment (ICAN), and an informal observation,
to establish a comprehensive evaluation of the student with a disability.
Using a variety of tests is not only recommended, but often necessary
to capture a true and accurate picture of disabled students' abilities.
|
Broad
Jump, MR, (Physical Fitness & Motor Skill Level Individuals
with Mental Retardation) |
|
Grip
Strength, Wheelchair, MR, (Project UNIQUE, Physical Fitness
& Motor Skill Level Individuals with Mental Retardation) |
|
Flex
Arm Hang, Wheelchair, MR (Project UNIQUE, Physical Fitness
& Motor Skill Level Individuals with Mental Retardation) |
|
Knee Push-ups,
(Bruininks-Oseretsky Test Motor Proficiency) |
|
Modified
Pull-ups (Prudential FITNESSGRAM) |
|
Sit &
Reach, Wheelchair, MR, (Project UNIQUE, Physical Fitness
& Motor Skill Level Individuals with Mental Retardation) |
|
Long Distance
Run, Wheelchair, (Project UNIQUE) |
|
Distance
Run -Walk, MR, (Physical Fitness & Motor Skill Level
Individuals with Mental Retardation) |
|
Height
& Weight Composition, MR, (Physical & Health Related
Fitness Test California) |
|
Skinfold,
Wheelchair, (Project UNIQUE) |
|
Additional Assessments
Used in Adapted Physical Activity
A. |
Physical
fitness and sports tests. |
|
Test
of Physical Fitness |
|
Physical
Best and Individuals with Disabilities: A Handbook for Inclusion
in Fitness Programs. |
|
Physical Best: A Physical
Fitness Education & Assessment Program |
|
The Brockport Physical
Fitness Test Manual |
|
The Fitness Appraisal |
|
ICAN health/fitness module |
|
Motor Fitness Testing Manual
for the Moderately Retarded |
|
Project Active: Physical
Fitness Test Battery |
|
Project Mobility |
|
Project Unique: Physical
Fitness Test for the Disabled |
|
Special Fitness Test Manual
for Mildly Mentally Retarded Persons |
|
The Step Test |
|
12 minute walk/run test |
|
Test
of Sport Skills |
|
Conatser Adapted Aquatics
Swimming Screening Test |
|
Project
ICAN: Team Sports, Dance and Individual Sports Module, Backyard/Neighborhood
Activities Module, Outdoor Activities Module |
|
Project
Mobility |
|
AAHPERD Skill Test Manual:
Basketball, Volleyball, Softball, Football |
|
Special Olympics Program
Guides for: Alpine Skiing, Gymnastics, Unified Sports, Volleyball,
Aquatics, Hockey, Football, Tennis, Aerobics, Horseshoes, Figure
Skating, Equestrian, Athletics, Motor Activity Cycling, Soccer,
Basketball, Nordic Skiing, Distance, Rowing, Bocce, Power lifting,
Running, Softball, Croquet, Bowling, Roller skating, Team Handball |
B. |
Motor
skills test |
|
Developmental
Scales & Schedules |
|
NCAST feeding & Teaching
Scale |
|
Battelle Developmental
Inventory (BDI) |
|
Bayley Scales of Motor
Development |
|
Brigance Diagnostic Inventory
of Early Development |
|
Denver Developmental Screening
Test II (DDST II) |
|
Early Intervention Developmental
Profile |
|
Geddes Psychomotor Inventory
(GPI) |
|
The Milani-Comparetti Motor
Development Screening Test |
|
Peabody Developmental Motor
Scales (PDMS) |
|
Primitive Reflex Profile |
|
Test
of Fundamental Motor Patterns |
|
Test of Gross Motor Development
(TGMD II) |
|
Project ICAN-Fundamental
Skills |
|
Body Skills |
|
Test
of Motor Ability |
|
Project
Active |
|
Project
Compact |
|
Bruinink-Oseretsky Test
of Motor Proficiency |
|
Basic Motor Ability Test
(BMAT) |
|
Test of Motor Impairment
(TOMI) |
|
Test
of Perceptual-Motor Competency |
|
Bender Visual-Motor Gestalt
Test |
|
Block Perceptual-Motor
Development Checklist |
|
Block Perceptual-Motor
Screening for Individuals with Multiple Handicaps |
|
Dayton Sensory Motor Awareness
Survey for four and five year olds |
|
Informal Screening of
Perceptual-Motor Skills |
|
Kansas Test of Perceptual-Motor
Dysfunction |
|
Motor Perceptual Survey
|
|
Moving Embedded Figures
Test |
|
The Purdue Perceptual-Motor
Survey (PPMS) |
|
Sensorimotor Integration
for Developmentally Disabled Children: Handbook |
|
Sherrill Perceptual-Motor
Task for Physical Education |
|
Southern California Perceptual
Motor Test (SCPMT) |
C. |
Physical
fitness and sports tests. |
|
Test
of Physical Fitness |
|
New York Posture Rating
Chart |
|
I CAN Poster Testing |
|
|